參考文獻(xiàn)

［澳］歐文·休斯（2001）：《公共管理導(dǎo)論》，彭和平譯，北京：中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社。

［美］文森特·奧斯特羅姆（1999）：《美國(guó)公共行政的思想危機(jī)》，毛壽龍譯，上海三聯(lián)書(shū)店。

［美］戴維·奧斯本、特德·蓋布勒（2006）：《改革政府》，周敦仁譯，上海譯文出版社。

［美］珍妮特·V·登哈特、羅伯特·B·登哈特（2004）：《新公共服務(wù)：服務(wù)，而不是掌舵》，丁煌譯，北京：中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社。

［德］韓博天（2010）：“通過(guò)實(shí)驗(yàn)制定政策：中國(guó)獨(dú)具特色的經(jīng)驗(yàn)”，《當(dāng)代中國(guó)史研究》，第3期。

包雅鈞（2006）：“從天津市南開(kāi)區(qū)‘超時(shí)默許’機(jī)制看行政審批創(chuàng)新”，《天津行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》，第2期。

陳振明（2000）：“評(píng)西方的‘新公共管理’范式”，《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)》，第6期。

史本山、陳蛇（2001）：“改善投資環(huán)境存在的問(wèn)題及其對(duì)策研究”，《軟科學(xué)》，第4期。

張成福、黨秀云（1995）：“中國(guó)公共行政的現(xiàn)代化——發(fā)展與變革”，《行政論壇》，第4期。

張成福（1999）：“面向21世紀(jì)的中國(guó)政府再造：基本戰(zhàn)略的選擇”，《教學(xué)與研究》，第7期。

張恒龍、陳憲（2006）：“財(cái)政競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)地方公共支出結(jié)構(gòu)的影響”，《經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較》，第6期。

周春生、黃紅華（2002）：“‘新公共管理’與中國(guó)公共管理的理論建設(shè)”，《浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》（人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版），第3期。

周黎安（2010）：“官員晉升錦標(biāo)賽與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)沖動(dòng)”，《人民論壇》，第5期。

周黎安（2007）：“中國(guó)地方官員的晉升錦標(biāo)賽模式研究”，《經(jīng)濟(jì)研究》，第7期。

Box, Richard C., Gary S. Marshall, B. J. Reed and Christine M. Reed (2001), "New Public Management and Substantive Democracy", Public Administration Review 61(5): 608-619.

Chan, Hon S. (2004), "Cadre Personnel Management in China: The Nomenklatura System, 1990-1998", The China Quarterly 179: 703-734.

Guo, Yong, 2008, "How does Economic Transition Breed Corruption?", China Economic Journal 1 (2): 227-236.

Hood, Christopher (1995), "Contemporary Public Management: A New Global Paradigm?", Public Policy and Administration 10(2):104-117.

Hughes, Owens E. (1998), Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, London: Macmillan Press.

Jing, Yijia (2008), "Outsourcing in China: An Exploratory Assessment", Public Administration and Development 28(2): 119-128.

Kaboolian, Linda (1998), "The New Public Management: Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate", Public Administration Review 58(3): 189-193.

Kelly, Rita Mae (1998), "An Inclusive Democratic Polity, Representative Bureaucracies, and the New Public Management", Public Administration Review 58(3): 201-208.

Larsson, Tomas (2006), "Reform, corruption, and growth: Why corruption is more devastating in Russia than in China", Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(2): 265-281.

Li, Hongbin and Li-An Zhou (2005), "Political Turnover and Economic Performance: the Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China", Journal of Public Economics 89(9-10): 1743-1762.

Lynn, Laurence E. (1998), "The New Public Management: How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy", Public Administration Review 58(3): 231-237.

Martin, Steve (2000), "Implementing 'Best Value': Local Public Services in Transition", Public Administration 78(1): 209-227.

Ocampo, Romeo B. (2000), "Models of Public Administration Reform: 'New public management (NPM)'", Asian Review of Public Administration 12(1): 248-255.

Oi, Jean C. (1992), "Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Lacal State Corporatism", World Politics 45(1): 99-126.

Qian, Yingyi (1995), "Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China", World Politics 48(1): 50-81.

Rocca, Jean-Louis (1992), "Corruption and Its Shadow", China Quarterly, 130: 402-416.

The Competition-driven Public Service Outsourcing

—"New Public Management" in Chinese Local Governments

Zhu Xufeng  Jiao Qiyuan

Abstract: Public service outsourcing is a form of "new public management"(NPM). Since the 1980s, the NPM has created a movement towards market-oriented government reform in the public sector of western countries, with an emphasis on using the management approach and the competitive mechanism found in the private sector. Even in China, where the government's operational mechanism differs tremendously from that of developed western countries, the authors also found NPM reform at work in the local governments. This article argues that the driving force behind NPM reform comes from the external pressure facing the government. In China, local governments compete with each other over economic performance and consequent promotion opportunities. The introduction of NPM can make local governments more efficient in providing public services, which can result in local governments attracting more investments and enhancing competitiveness.

Keywords: new public management, competition among local governments, public service outsourcing, the third-party intermediary agencies

【作者簡(jiǎn)介】

朱旭峰，清華大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院教授、博導(dǎo)。

研究方向：政策過(guò)程理論、思想庫(kù)與專(zhuān)家參與、轉(zhuǎn)型與公共治理。

主要著作：《The Rise of Think Tanks in China》、《政策變遷中的專(zhuān)家參與》、《中國(guó)思想庫(kù)》等。

矯其原，南開(kāi)大學(xué)周恩來(lái)政府管理學(xué)院行政管理學(xué)碩士研究生。