23中俄等國(guó)向66屆聯(lián)大提交的《信息安全國(guó)際行為準(zhǔn)則》，http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn//pds/ziliao/tytj/t858317.htm，訪問(wèn)日期：2016年2月1日。

24習(xí)近平：《在第二屆世界互聯(lián)網(wǎng)大會(huì)開(kāi)幕式上的講話》，《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》，2015年12月17日第2版。

25楊嶸均：《論網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間治理國(guó)際合作面臨的難題及其應(yīng)對(duì)策略》，《南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》（社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2014年第4期。

The Future of the Global Cyberspace Governance: Sovereignty, Competition and Consensus

Wang Mingjin

Abstract: Currently, there has been a hot debate in the international community on the governance of cyberspace. This illustrates that the major powers pay attention to the rulemaking authority for the governance of the Internet on the one hand, and also shows the decline of the cyber liberalism on the other hand. The international community has reached a consensus that the cyberspace needs to be governed. But there are two distinct viewpoints about the nature of cyberspace—"global commons" and "Internet sovereignty", so there are serious differences and conflicts in cyberspace governance. Against the background of the declining Internet liberalism, in the specific areas of governance where sharp differences seem to exist, the consensus of the international community over cyberspace governance is increasing. The global cyberspace politics is a true reflection of the realistic international politics. Seeking cooperation while competing with other nations, and expanding consensus amidst the differences, will be the normal in cyberspace governance in the international community.

Keywords: cyberspace, cyber liberalism, Internet sovereignty, Internet security strategy, governance

                                                                                            責(zé) 編∕楊昀赟